Remove Analytics

Charles La FLEUR

b.
p.
d.
p.

Joseph A. La FLEUR

b. Nov 1849
p. Albany, Albany, New York, USA
d. 5 Jun 1909
p. Albany, Albany, New York, USA

Joseph La FLEUR

b. 1827
d.

Joseph BEIQUE dit LAFLEUR

b. 15 Sep 1800
d. 30 Oct 1852

Joseph BEIQUE dit LAFLEUR

b.
d.

Marie Charlotte HUNAULT dit DESCHAMPS

b.
d.

Adelaide HOGUE

b. 5 Jul 1801
d. 29 Jan 1892

Simon HOGUE

b. 30 Jan 1771
d. 26 SEP 1844 •

Marguerite Marie LACASSE

b. 16 Nov 1771
d. 12 DÉCEMBRE 1816 •

Nancy DAVIDSON

b. 1831
d. Abt 1859

Robert DAVIDSON

b. 1807
d. 11 Sep 1853

Mary E. McCLELLAND

b. 1809
d. 31 Mar 1880

(__?__) McCLELLAND

b.
d.

Nancy (__?__)

b. 1780
d.

Kate DANIELS

b. 1853
p. Baltimore, , Maryland, USA
d. 14 Dec 1894
p. Albany, Albany, New York, USA

PIKWA - Performance Indicator Kwartierstaat

These Charts show the relative state of completion of an individual's Pedigree Chart. It compares the number of vital statistics currently found to the total required to fill ten generations out from the chosen person.

The PIKWA concept was developed by Otto P. van Driel in The Netherlands.
Adapted to our Pedigree Charts by Rob Vanderplas

Combined

2

(6/7) 85%

3

(6/14) 42%

4

(13/28) 46%

5

(12/56) 21%

6

(9/112) 8%

7

(8/224) 3%

8

(6/448) 1%

9

(0/896) 0%

Tot:

(60/1785) 3%

People

2

(2/2) 100%

3

(2/4) 50%

4

(4/8) 50%

5

(6/16) 37%

6

(4/32) 12%

7

(4/64) 6%

8

(2/128) 1%

9

(0/256) 0%

Tot:

(24/510) 4%

Birth Dates

2

(2/2) 100%

3

(2/4) 50%

4

(4/8) 50%

5

(3/16) 18%

6

(2/32) 6%

7

(2/64) 3%

8

(2/128) 1%

9

(0/256) 0%

Tot:

(17/510) 3%

Marriage Dates

2

(0/1) 0%

3

(1/2) 50%

4

(1/4) 25%

5

(1/8) 12%

6

(1/16) 6%

7

(0/32) 0%

8

(0/64) 0%

9

(0/128) 0%

Tot:

(4/255) 1%

Death Dates

2

(2/2) 100%

3

(1/4) 25%

4

(4/8) 50%

5

(2/16) 12%

6

(2/32) 6%

7

(2/64) 3%

8

(2/128) 1%

9

(0/256) 0%

Tot:

(15/510) 2%